Sometimes, I just can't let my daily-readership of web-comics be completely un-partisan. The issues at hand came from this comic, http://www.pvponline.com/archive.php3?archive=20050628.

(Click image to view full size)
There are two issues I want to bring to Scott's attention.
The first topic is the depiction of Christ condoning homosexuality as an acceptable practice. I can't find anywhere in the Bible where he said something like that. Here's some quick examples of what the Bible says against the practice though.
Lev. 18:22 "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination"
Lev. 20:13 "If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltness is upon them"
1 Cor. 6:9-10 "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
Rom. 1:26-28 "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. 28And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper."
So the question is Kurtz, why would you have made this claim? Is it for art's sake? Are you letting the work speak for itself? My conclusion of the art speaking to me is that you believe the standpoint of God to be in agreement with it. The word of God from the Bible says you're wrong. Are you man enough to admit it?
The Second topic is slightly less drastic, but none-the-less cuts to the core of your world-view. Is using God's name as a cuss word really a big deal? Happens to be that it is. Read Exodus 20 when God gave the 10 Commandments to the Israelites.
Ex. 20:7 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
Scott is right that the dude needs to a chill pill and take a different approach. We're never taught to approach people out of disgust, but out of love as Christ did. Also, very right that there are people dying in the world, and there's more important things to take a stand on. What I don't understand is the lack of humility, or admission of something which is genuinely sin. The guy in question may not have had the best methods, but the end result could have been reached just as easily with a softer heart on the receiving end. Should we all be able to keep our speech clean, and free from using the name of the One who gave us life and using it to express digust? Yes. Especially for someone with as much wit and imagination as Scott.
Scott is in an amazing position to influence his readership. I pray that he could come to a relationship with Christ and that it would also be visible to his readers.